site stats

Greyhound corp v superior court

Webdiscovery. (Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, supra, 56 Cal.2d at p. 383.) A reviewing court may not use the abuse of discretion standard to shield discovery orders that fall … WebFebruary 23, 1961. PROCEEDING in mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and Philbrick McCoy, Judge thereof, to vacate its order denying petitioners' motion to require the real party in interest to answer certain interrogatories. Writ granted. Brock, Fleishman Rykoff for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondents.

FindLaw

WebOn March 15, 1965, the San Francisco Superior Court sustained Greyhound's demurrer without leave to amend. Said demurrer was sustained on the basis that the federal … Web2 The leading case is Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, 56 Cal. 2d 355, 364 P.2d 266, 15 Cal. Rptr. 90 (1961). Since then the supreme court has considered the discovery provi-sions on numerous occasions and has consistently maintained a "liberal" viewpoint. See, role of mother baby nurse https://duffinslessordodd.com

Calcor Space Facility, Inc. v. Superior Court - Casetext

WebThe named defendant on review was the Superior Court, since the case went to the Supreme Court on the issue of whether a writ of mandate should ... 143 Cal. Rptr. 710 (quoting Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, 56 Cal. 2d 355, 382-83, 364 P.2d 266, 279, 15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 103 (1961) (emphasis in the original)). 16. 357 U.S. 449 (1958). 17. 20 ... WebJul 17, 2010 · The Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate, based on Greyhound Corp. v. Sup. Ct. (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355. The California Supreme Court granted review and … WebJul 13, 2024 · The statutory scheme vests trial courts with " ‘wide discretion’ " to allow or prohibit discovery. ( Emerson Electric Co. v. Superior Court (1997) 16 Cal.4th 1101, 1107, 68 Cal.Rptr.2d 883, 946 P.2d 841, quoting Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355, 378, 15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266 .) role of mother of the groom

Discovery Prior to Administrative Adjudications. A …

Category:GREYHOUND CORPORATION v. Earline Z. Clay et al., Real Parties in ...

Tags:Greyhound corp v superior court

Greyhound corp v superior court

Analyses of Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, 56 Cal.2d …

WebThe Beesley opinion points out that in the case of Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, 56 Cal. 2d 355 [15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266], it was held that written statements of independent witnesses are subject to inspection when the need is shown. The court, in the Beesley opinion, at page 208, continues: "Here good cause was shown in the fact ... WebThe court held in Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal. 2d 355, 397, 15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266, that remarks made by defense investigators were not protected by the attorney-client privilege. Greyhound questioned Holm's ruling that photographs sent to counsel were protected by the attorney-client privilege, and determined that ...

Greyhound corp v superior court

Did you know?

WebAug 26, 2024 · Virginia’s highest court has overturned a homeowners association’s lawsuit victory. The court ruled that the HOA overstepped in fining and suing a family for leaving … WebJun 25, 2012 · The majority, relying on Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355, 15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266 ( Greyhound ) and expressly declining to follow Nacht & Lewis, concluded that witness interviews and the information sought by form interrogatory No. 12.3 are not entitled as a matter of law to absolute or qualified work …

Webgreyhound corp. v. superior court PETERS, J. In this proceeding an alternative writ of prohibition was granted for the purpose of reviewing an order of discovery made by … WebIn Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, supra, 56 Cal. 2d 355, 378, the court stated, "For the [237 Cal. App. 2d 757] guidance of trial courts the proper rule [of construction of the discovery statutes] is declared to be not only one of liberal interpretation, but one that also recognizes that disclosure is a matter of right unless statutory or ...

WebJun 18, 2013 · Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 C2d 355, 15 CR 90, interpreting the Discovery Act of 1957. The intention of the discovery statutes is to … WebSep 10, 2014 · The same court relied on Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961), 56 Cal.2d 355, 382-383, 388 as to how statutes must be viewed, stating: “The statutes must be liberally construed in favor of discovery, and the courts must not extend the limits on discovery beyond those expressed by the legislature. Other than to protect against …

WebFeb 28, 1997 · In Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266 ], the seminal case in California civil discovery, the court gave examples of improper "fishing" which clearly apply here: "The method of `fishing' may be, in a particular case, entirely improper (i.e., insufficient identification of the requested …

WebDec 1, 1997 · ( Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal. 2d 355, 376, 15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266.) "Certainly, it can be said, that the Legislature intended to take the 'game' element out of trial preparation while yet retaining the adversary nature of … outback steakhouse in gold riverWebIn Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, 56 Cal.2d 355 [15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266], it was pointed out (p. 390) that in adopting the discovery statutes the Legislature had … role of motivation in business communicationWebGREYHOUND CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF MERCED, Respondent; Earline Z. Clay et al., … role of mothers in the biblerole of motor unit in muscle contractionWebMorris Stulsaft Foundation v. Superior Court ( Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355, 378-379 [ 15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266]; City of… Greyhound Corp. v. … outback steakhouse in goldsboro ncWebThe superior court held another hearing on December 5, 1969; when Dr. Lifschutz again refused to comply with the order, the court adjudged him in contempt (Code Civ. Proc., § 1209, subd. 5) fn. 2 and ordered him to be confined in the custody of the Sheriff of San Mateo County (Code Civ. Proc., § 1219). role of mri in cervical cancerWebThe same concept was stated in Rolf Homes, Inc. v. Superior Court, supra, 186 Cal.App.2d 876, 881, and to some extent in Laddon v. Superior Court, supra, 167 Cal.App. {Page 56 Cal.2d 391} 391, wherein (at p. 395) the court expressed the view that relevancy as applied to pretrial examination (discovery) is more loosely construed than it is when ... role of mofpi